[advocacy-discuss] Re: Logo/Mascot for OpenSolaris

[Casper.Dik at sun.com]

>To make it clear, let's change the words here. Let's say that some  
>other CG is working on, say, a new installer
>
>- OGB asks CG to design a new installer
>- CG goes and does it, comes back with a result
>- OGB says "thank-you" and gives it a stamp of approval.
>
>This sounds outrageous, no?  So why should the expert work product of  
>the Advocacy CG be subject to either a commissioning step or of an  
>approval step by the OGB, which exists only to resolve disputes.

+1.

I don't think the OGB should be involved in any of these steps.

The only thing we should be involved in is creating communities, if that,
projects should be community driven and may or may not come to fruition.

I'd rather have a high churn and a high failure rate than nothing getting
of the ground.

Casper