[advocacy-discuss] [indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] I'm sorry, but I just don't get it

[Sara Dornsife]

Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> Consensus? Among whom? It should be obvious that there are actually
>> many people in this community that do believe there should be one
>> *reference* distribution called OpenSolaris.
>>     
>
> That is not the argument, and you know it.  The argument is that no single
> project is allowed to take the OpenSolaris name and claim that it owns it.
>   

If no single project is allowed to take the OpenSolaris name and that it 
owns it? If the argument is not about "one *reference* distribution 
called OpenSolaris, can you please reconcile these two things for me?

> I think there is no argument that Indiana has done so.
>
>   
>> You didn't ask me for my vote on it; so your consensus is among
>> yourselves; not the community. If you still think it is, then you must
>> be using an interesting definition of consensus.
>>     
>
>
>   
>> I also think it's a bit silly to say that the elected body is speaking
>> with one voice. If I recall correctly, Glynn abstained.
>>     
>
> As Glynn works for Ian he is in a rather more difficult position than all 
> of us.
>   

Glynn actually works for me I am proud to say.

> Casper
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/advocacy-discuss/attachments/20071102/53c5d38a/attachment-0001.html