[advocacy-discuss] Advocacy Voting and Project Proposal Process (draft)
Mads Toftum
mads at toftum.dk
Wed Feb 13 04:54:06 PST 2008
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:04:11PM +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> (1) Core Contributor -- Nominated by a Core Contributor, three +1 votes,
> no -1 votes, duration within five days, only CCs can vote.
I can't really see much harm in letting Contributors nominate as well as
long as you keep the 3 Core Contributor votes requirement.
>
> (2) Contributor -- Self nominated or nominated by a Contributor or Core
> Contributor, no -1 votes, no minimum or maximum +1 votes, duration
> within five days, only CCs can vote.
>
This seems a bit odd to me. Effectively you can nominate yourself and
slip under the radar if nobody hates you enough to vote no? I think it
would be more "balanced" if you changed this to mirror the procedure in
(1) and just extended it to accept nominations/votes from Contributors.
> (3) Project and/or User Group -- Proposal based on the new format below,
> one +1 vote, no -1 votes, duration within five days, only CCs can vote.
>
This one looks fine - getting many people to vote for user groups in
places they've never heard of is probably too big of a requirement.
vh
Mads Toftum
--
http://soulfood.dk
More information about the advocacy-discuss
mailing list