[advocacy-discuss] Advocacy Voting and Project Proposal Process (draft)
Menno Lageman
Menno.Lageman at Sun.COM
Sun Feb 17 00:58:41 PST 2008
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Ok, based on the feedback I updated this voting proposal. I didn't see
> anyone really objecting, so I took all the suggestions as best as I
> could resolve them. I did make changes to clarify, so check me and see
> what you think ...
>
>
> Voting Procedures for the Advocacy Community Group
>
> The Advocacy CG voting procedures are based on the OpenSolaris
> Constitution and the OpenSolaris Governing Board's Project Instantiation
> Policy and cover the following areas: Participant, Contributor, Core
> Contributor, User Group Proposals, Project Proposals. Questions should
> be directed to advocacy-discuss.
>
> 1. Participant: Register on opensolaris.org and advocacy-discuss and
> participate in community conversations.
>
> 2. Contributor: To earn Contributor status you need to be nominated
> by a Contributor or Core Contributor. You also need a total of two
> +1 votes and no -1 votes. Only Core Contributors can vote, and
> voting is open on advocacy-discuss for five days. The initial
> nomination is considered a +1 vote.
>
> 3. Core Contributor: To earn Core Contributor status you need to be
> nominated by a Core Contributor. You also need a total of three +1
> votes with no -1 votes. Only Core Contributors can vote, and
> voting is open on advocacy-discuss for five days. The initial
> nomination is considered a +1 vote.
>
> 4. User Groups: To get user group infrastructure on opensolaris.org,
> you need to send a proposal to advocacy-discuss for approval. You
> need one +1 vote and no -1 votes. Only Core Contributors can vote,
> and voting is open on advocacy-discuss for five days. Write your
> proposal in the following format:
>
> 1. Name of user group.
> 2. Three or more initial participants listed with their
> OpenSolaris user IDs.
> 3. A one paragraph description of the group, including location
> and activities planned.
>
> 5. Projects: Project proposals follow the OGB's Project Instantiation
> Policy.
>
Jim,
what is the discerning factor between being a Core Contributor or a
Contributor (i.e. what makes a person a Core Contributor instead of a
Contributor)? Right now, the draft seems to suggest that the difference
is in the status of the person nominating and number of +1 and -1 votes.
The desktop guys have criteria for this based on merit (like 'do x' to
be eligible for Contributor status , do 'y' to be eligible for Core
Contributor status). Shouldn't this CG also have some criteria?
Menno
--
Menno Lageman - Sun Microsystems - http://blogs.sun.com/menno
More information about the advocacy-discuss
mailing list