[advocacy-discuss] Contributor status

[Jim Grisanzio]

Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> That's 3 votes in favor and since we have a project approval process of 
> 2 votes I think as a practical matter we can call this done. Welcome, 
> Steve. :) I'll send a note to the OGB. We really should document this 
> process though. I started a thread about it a while back. Next week I'll 
> dig it out and take a stab at updating it.
>   
Actually, I'm an idiot. Nothing really to document. It's already 
documented in the Constitution in "ARTICLE VIII. Community Group Voting 
Procedures" http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/governance/. The 
only thing I'd add is that we should update our rolls on a weekly basis, 
instead of a daily basis. That means that as we nominate/vote on people 
during the week, I as Facilitator will mail the OGB at the end of each 
week leading up to the election.

Our voting in Advocacy has been a bit lax but that's ok. We're friends. 
:) And we've come very close to getting it right. :) But since we have a 
gigantic election coming up, we should just follow the documented 
process in the governance.

If you don't know if you are a Core Contributor or a Contributor, click 
on the "grants" tab on this page and search the names: 
http://vote.opensolaris.org/

Jim

-- 
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris