[advocacy-discuss] Mascot, was Re: Logo Feedback
Dan Roberts
Dan.Roberts at Sun.COM
Thu Mar 27 11:54:59 PDT 2008
Assuming the mascot is decided upon by the community, after coming from
someone in the community, and it's licensed under an open source or
creative commons license, I think anyone could do the legal work around
it. Before Sun would use it though, we'd have a responsibility to check
to ensure we're satisfied with that work by having our legal check it.
We'd be the deep pocket anyone would come after in all likelihood so
would have to protect ourselves. It would save us a bit of money if
that did happen, but agree the point is likely moot in the short term
anyway.
So given all the discussion here, is this a plus 1 vote to set up a
sub-project on advocacy to get this going in a structured way?
Dan
Laurent Blume wrote:
> Simon Phipps a écrit :
>> Undoubtedly needs looking at, yes. At some point we'll have to ask Sun
>> to spend money on that for us (unless we have come into an inheritance).
>
> Even if we did, Sun is probably the only one entitled to receive and
> spend it on the behalf of the OpenSolaris Community, right?
> Quite normal, too. Sun is naturally both the main single beneficiary and
> sponsor of the OS Community, and that will probably remain so for a
> while. I'm sure that if this ever changes, a solution will be worked out.
>
> Laurent
More information about the advocacy-discuss
mailing list