[advocacy-discuss] [website-discuss] Thoughts on an opensolaris.com
Glynn Foster
Glynn.Foster at Sun.COM
Tue Mar 18 15:50:52 PDT 2008
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Generally, I support any way to provide a better platform for
> OpenSolaris user groups to grow and diversify. That's really my main
> focus in Advocacy, after all, so if the UGs get a better deal out of it
> that's cool. I think the recent migration of UGs to projects on .org has
> worked out very well as an interim solution since we never had any plan
> to support UGs on .org initially (they were always part of the
> "Community/Project" structure even though they don't necessarily fit
> either). We should try to offer more support to UGs (resources, wiki
> site functionality, higher profile, etc) -- which, I assume, .com will
> provide.
I agree though, as Laurent pointed out in a later post, most user groups have
enough knowledge to be able to create a page themselves. Ideally whatever web
infrastructure we create, we'll be able to handle both cases.
> But UGs are not exclusively users. They are a mix of users and
> developers, and they number about 5K people at this point. Also,
> although many UGs may want to move, I can see some wanting to stay. In
> that case, we'd have UGs living in two different locations (.com and
> .org) with presumably two different offerings. That's not the end of the
> world, of course, but it can be confusing. Another issue to consider is
> governance. If the UGs move to .com, how would we enable those people
> who have earned their Membership in OpenSolaris via Advocacy (since
> Advocacy sponsors the UGs) to keep their voice in governance?
Governance is a hard issue. It's not clear (to me) how user groups currently
govern themselves, or clear of their involvement in the advocacy community.
Fortunately, that's probably a result of the fact that you've just continued
doing work rather than worry about the Constitution. I think *most* of the issue
may only revolve around who gets to vote for the OGB. I have thoughts about
that, and how the governance model could reshape if an opensolaris.com comes
along, but that'll involve another separate writeup I think! :)
Glynn
More information about the advocacy-discuss
mailing list