[advocacy-discuss] "What is OpenSolaris" page

[Mads Toftum]

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:03:20PM -0700, Simon Phipps wrote:
> Sorry, I disagree. Given the desktop and developer focus of OpenSolaris 
> 2008.05, it seems entirely rational to put SPARC on the "later" list. Now, 
> if SPARC is still missing-in-action when the (Open)Solaris LTS distro that 
> Tim Cramer talked about on Saturday happens, /that/ would be a big bug.
>
Let's just agree to disagree then. Indiana was rushed out the door if
sparc couldn't make it. The primary reason I've heard was missing zfs
boot, but that's supposedly done (or very close to). Waiting for a
couple of months before rolling indiana 2008.something would have had a
better chance of wider adoption.

just my EUR .02

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
http://soulfood.dk