[advocacy-discuss] Corporate Open Source
Ceri Davies
ceri at submonkey.net
Thu May 1 06:34:00 PDT 2008
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:30:25AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:03:18AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:40:56PM -0700, Dan Roberts wrote:
> > > > > Though we are certainly aware that some customers will want to move
> > > > > certain applications or new systems to OpenSolaris to take advantage of
> > > > > the latest innovation as soon as possible. Which is one of the reasons
> > > > > why we are offering full production support right away.
> > > >
> > > > Does the existence of production support imply that Indiana/OpenSolaris
> > > > 2005.08 is considered stable wrt interfaces and so on?
> > >
> > > I don't see how it necessarily implies so.
> >
> > Nor I, hence the question.
> >
> > > Remember, SXDE had
> > > commercial support available too, but things in are certainly not
> > > guaranteed to be in Solaris for a long time.
> >
> > SXDE had been through ARC, it's different.
>
> ARC is not a magical process. It does not automatically mean something
> is "blessed."
>
> So, on the basis of ARC alone, no I don't believe it to be different.
It doesn't really matter.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/advocacy-discuss/attachments/20080501/1f208e28/attachment.bin
More information about the advocacy-discuss
mailing list