[advocacy-discuss] Corporate Open Source

Ceri Davies ceri at submonkey.net
Thu May 1 06:34:00 PDT 2008


On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:30:25AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:03:18AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >  > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> wrote:
> >  > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:40:56PM -0700, Dan Roberts wrote:
> >  > >  > Though we are certainly aware that some customers will want to move
> >  > >  > certain applications or new systems to OpenSolaris to take advantage of
> >  > >  > the latest innovation as soon as possible.  Which is one of the reasons
> >  > >  > why we are offering full production support right away.
> >  > >
> >  > >  Does the existence of production support imply that Indiana/OpenSolaris
> >  > >  2005.08 is considered stable wrt interfaces and so on?
> >  >
> >  > I don't see how it necessarily implies so.
> >
> >  Nor I, hence the question.
> >
> >  >  Remember, SXDE had
> >  > commercial support available too, but things in are certainly not
> >  > guaranteed to be in Solaris for a long time.
> >
> >  SXDE had been through ARC, it's different.
> 
> ARC is not a magical process. It does not automatically mean something
> is "blessed."
> 
> So, on the basis of ARC alone, no I don't believe it to be different.

It doesn't really matter.

Ceri
-- 
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/advocacy-discuss/attachments/20080501/1f208e28/attachment.bin 


More information about the advocacy-discuss mailing list