[advocacy-discuss] "What is OpenSolaris" page

[Rich Teer]

On Thu, 8 May 2008, John Plocher wrote:

> Could be.  It could also be that some things are not bugs at all, or
> maybe they aren't as important as other bugs.  My take for OpenSolaris:
> 
> P1 bugs
> =======
> Not being immediately and intuitively usable by Linux developers
> Not being binary compatible at the libc/kernel level with Solaris10
> Not being standards branded
> Changing something incompatibly from Solaris10 without a
>      transition/mitigation plan
> Hard coded and unchangeable preference/policy settings (PATH, SHELL, ...)

Given the above, I would assert the need for a P0 bug:

Not being immediately and intuitively usable by Solaris developers.

-- 
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA

CEO,
My Online Home Inventory

URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
      http://www.linkedin.com/in/richteer
      http://www.myonlinehomeinventory.com