[advocacy-discuss] Any responses to this Infoworld Article ?

[Jim Grisanzio]

On 28/09/2008 06:15, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
> What I always find funny about these articles is they're arguing 
> OpenSolaris/Solaris is irrelevant (as stated in the subheading) or 
> dying.  If that's the case, why go make the argument in the press?  It'd 
> not be worth discussing if it were true, right? 
>   

That's pretty much what Stephen at Redmonk said (in part) the last time 
this all came up:
http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/02/20/linux-vs-opensolarisagain-the-qa/

Jim

-- 
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/