[advocacy-discuss] Adding OSUNIX project

[Jim Grisanzio]

Peter Tribble wrote:
> 2009/5/11 "C. Bergström" <codestr0m at osunix.org>:
>   

>> It's also pretty clear that [1] seems to be written by some lawyer.
>>     
>
> I hope not...it shouldn't be read that way, rather that the closer you follow
> procedure the easier it will be to push things through the system.
>
>   

It wasn`t written by a lawyer. But it`s a tad on the complex side. :)

I`ve asked the OGB to consider adopting the project lifecycle process we 
tried to get approved with the new constitution (which as not approved) 
a few months ago. The group lifecycle process is very simple and would 
treat all groups equally with one centralized process, whereas now we 
have three separate processes to create communities, projects, and user 
groups. And to make matters even more complex, the documents explaining 
those processes live in three separate locations. It`s silly. We need 
one process to create/delete/archive groups. Glynn wrote it. It`s good. 
We should update the thing and just use it.

Jim
-- 
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/