From Richard.Elling at Sun.COM Tue Aug 1 09:35:28 2006 From: Richard.Elling at Sun.COM (Richard Elling) Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:35:28 -0700 Subject: [approach-discuss] Making OpenSolaris behave more like ... (or why can't I have xxx instead of /sbin/sh) In-Reply-To: <1154372090.17277.115.camel@haiiro> References: <1154372090.17277.115.camel@haiiro> Message-ID: <44CF82D0.30006@sun.com> Maybe you just want a different distro? -- richard From Tim.Foster at Sun.COM Tue Aug 1 09:48:57 2006 From: Tim.Foster at Sun.COM (Tim Foster) Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:48:57 +0100 Subject: [approach-discuss] Making OpenSolaris behave more like ... (or why can't I have xxx instead of /sbin/sh) In-Reply-To: <44CF82D0.30006@sun.com> References: <1154372090.17277.115.camel@haiiro> <44CF82D0.30006@sun.com> Message-ID: <1154450937.8918.114.camel@haiiro> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 09:35 -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > Maybe you just want a different distro? Maybe indeed! Joe-user starts on a distro he's more comfortable with (sort of like OpenSolaris-with-training-wheels) up to the point where he has to choose whether he wants to buy technical support for his now-in-production system. He then has to start making hard decisions about running an unsupported OS with better (perceived) ease-of-use vs. learning to live with Solaris and the problems he has with it, but getting full support. Like everything else, it's a trade-off - my question is, do we tip the scales more in his favour by doing what we can to make life easier for Joe ? Hmm, that brings us back to the "support" problem I think. How to support multiple configurations (where support here means not just "implement" but "take customer calls about x not working in the wee small hours") :-/ cheers, tim -- Tim Foster, Sun Microsystems Inc, Operating Platforms Group Engineering Operations http://blogs.sun.com/timf From tim.foster at sun.com Wed Aug 2 03:06:44 2006 From: tim.foster at sun.com (Tim Foster) Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:06:44 PDT Subject: [approach-discuss] Re: Making OpenSolaris behave more like ... (or why can't I have xxx inste In-Reply-To: <1154372090.17277.115.camel@haiiro> Message-ID: <16577337.1154513250672.JavaMail.suncom@oss-app2> For the benefit of users of the forums on opensolaris.org, here's a pointer to my original post - the forum seems to have lost it: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/approach-discuss/2006-July/000186.html This message posted from opensolaris.org