[approach-discuss] Re: first draft of Network Auto-Magic architecture
John Beck
jbeck at eng.sun.com
Tue Feb 21 13:38:44 PST 2006
Paul> I think phrasing this in terms of:
Paul> "what values would people want the timer to be? a,b,c?"
Paul> is not conducive to finding a Better Way(TM).
Paul> She might as well just be asked (unobtrusively) what is best action to
Paul> take as and when the events /occur/ ...
OK, let me try again.
---
When a "network--" event has been detected, how should the system handle it?
1. Query the user after ___ seconds as to possible actions.
2. After ___ seconds, assume the network is gone and reconfigure
accordingly.
3. Do nothing; the user will handle it manually.
(Note that, in both options 1 and 2, 0 seconds means immediately.)
---
In other words, I agree that querying should be an option (it was an oversight
rather than anything intentional which led me to omit it in my previous
message), but I also believe that not querying (i.e., auto-magic) should be
an option. Further, I believe that there will be people who feel strongly on
both sides, so in the interest of avoiding a religious war, it seems the only
solution is to support both options, probably on a per-profile basis.
-- John
More information about the approach-discuss
mailing list