[arc-discuss] Classifying FOSS (was Re: Integrate Unison into Solaris)
Torrey McMahon
Torrey.McMahon at Sun.COM
Mon Mar 31 11:59:02 PDT 2008
Before anyone asks I pulled off the psarc-ext alias. :)
Outside of the process argument in general I think its clear we need a
better set of tools. I made the same argument at arc-chairs years ago
before opensoalaris, opensource, the huge set of FOSS was being packaged
up, etc.
Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
> Back to the SDF, there weren't supposed to be any documents that were
> just for ARC review. The documents were supposed to just "fall out"
> of other requirements.
>
> This never quite worked for a number of reasons. A large one was that
> the functional spec was too high level and the design spec was
> probably too detailed.
>
> Anyway, all that I'm pointing is out the process is *supposed* to be
> as light weight as possible and part of that is to accept a wide range
> of possible materials. Maybe this doesn't work anymore, but I still
> think the process should be as light of a weight a process as possible
> for the submitter.
>
> That said, the recent flurries of mail seem to indicate that "there
> must be a better way".
More information about the arc-discuss
mailing list