[awards-program] [Fwd: New Judging Criteria - OpenSolaris]

[Jesse Silver]

These are fabulous!

Teresa Giacomini wrote:
> Here's the note I sent off to the attorneys yesterday.  Comments?
>
> T
>
> ========================================================
>
> Jen, Linda,
>
> Here are some new judging criteria for the OpenSolaris awards.  Can you 
> please incorporate them in?  Do we have to declare the weighting up 
> front?  Our intention is that only the main idea would be in the rules; 
> the bullets underneath would go in the instructions to the judges and 
> the FAQ.
>
> Thanks,
> T
>
> Code Contributions:
>
> 1.  Usefulness to the endusers and/or the community (33%)
> 	- competitive need relative to other OS?
> 	- attractiveness to users
> 	- usability of implementation
> 	- documentation
> 	- timeliness to market
> 2.  Technical difficulty of implementation (33%)
> 	- depth of knowledge required for implementation
> 	- quantity of code, functions, and features
> 	- quality and cleanliness of code
> 3.  Innovation (34%)
> 	- market disruptiveness
> 	- originality of implementation
> 	- market potential for adoption
>
>
> Non-code Contributions:
>
> 1.  Enduser Acceptance (33%)
> 	- public appeal
> 	- usefulness to the community
> 	- market potential and disruptiveness
>
> 2.  Publication Quality (33%)
> 	- quality of work (syntax, diction, grammar, editing,
> 		visual artwork)
> 	- publication readiness
> 	- layout, direction, animation
> 	- professionalism
>
> 3.  Artistic Quality (34%)
> 	- interpretation of objective or theme
> 	- style (of writing or artwork)
>        - originality of work
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> awards-program mailing list
> awards-program at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/awards-program
>