[awards-program] Notes: Community Awards Meeting - 1/14

[Teresa Giacomini]

Here are my notes from the meeting today.  Please let me know if I 
missed or mis-represented anything.

* Attendees*
Alta
Jim
Ben
James
Teresa
Jesse
Linda - Legal
Jen - Legal

*Action Items*
AI - Teresa to send Manatt the SCA and Bonnie's note

*Discussion on Rules*
- SCA - we agreed that if the SCA is signed, ownership should be ok.
- In addition to the SCA, the Entrant will need to sign an affadavit 
explicitly stating what is their original work and what is based on 
other open source work.  We need to decide whether or not that affidavit 
is signed at the time of registration, entry, or if only the winners 
need to sign.  We can set this up electronically if we have the 
resources to do so.
- We agreed on the following language for the Entry section of the Rules:

"Qualified entries must be submitted as a compressed archive (.zip, 
.tar.gz, etc.) containing at least the following:
 1)  A 'LICENSE' file containing the OSI-Approved license covering the 
submission
 2)  A 'README' file containing, but not limited to:
    a) The original copyright owners name and date
    b) Submission description including the problem being solved or the need being filled
    c) Information required to assemble the contents into a usable form 
(build instructions, etc)
 3) A "usable" form of your submission: executable binary, package, 
video, PDF, etc as applicable
 4) Any and all applicable source materials required to re-create the 
"usable" form and applicable build environment.  (Makefiles, source 
code, XML/LaTeX source, etc.)

Any Entries that are found to possess differences between the "usable form" and 
the "source materials" will be disqualified."

*Student Research Awards*

Do we want to limit to undergrads?