[brandz-discuss] lx brandz on intel: nslookup/dig failures

Wolfgang Engelien woe2001 at med.cornell.edu
Fri Aug 4 12:38:14 PDT 2006


At 11:25 PM 8/3/2006, Eric Enright wrote:
>You should maybe look into upgrading to build 43, as build 35 is
>fairly old.. My experiences below are with 43.

Yes, I just have to figure out the way to do that ...
(I never compiled any solaris or bfu'd anything. I am still searching 
for info on which compiled version of Solaris (Solris Express or 
others) I can use the provided bfu scripts)


>Ping works for me, but nslookup and dig both give me this:
>
>$ nslookup google.ca
>;; reply from unexpected source: 192.168.0.1#53, expected 192.168.0.1#53
>;; reply from unexpected source: 192.168.0.1#53, expected 192.168.0.1#53
After these two lines I get

;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

However I can ssh into the nameserver with no problem. NFS mounts are 
no problem either.

>>  2) Does anybody have a implementation of Solaris on Intel with brandz and
>>lx brand, where name service lookups are working?
>
>Yes, mine works fine:
What kind of intel processor do you run?



>[eric at linux eric]$ uname -a
>Linux linux 2.4.21 BrandZ fake linux i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Is this based on CentOS? Which version?
Or is it RHEL AS 3? Which Update?

>[eric at linux eric]$ telnet google.ca 80
>Trying 216.239.57.104...
>Connected to google.ca (216.239.57.104).
>Escape character is '^]'.
>^]q
>
>Connection closed.

This does not work in my setup.



>My zone is configured to be on the same subnet as the global zone,
>however.  If you create your own private one for zones, then the
>routing becomes a bit more complicated and you need to play with
>ipfilter.  Which setup do you have?

My zone is actually on a different subnet. I will put it on the same 
subnet to check if it makes a difference.

>These are the only modifications I have made to my zone's networking:
>
>$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network
>NETWORKING=yes
>HOSTNAME=linux
>GATEWAY=192.168.0.1
This is the same.

>$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
>nameserver 192.168.0.1
I have also a domain and search entry.


>And in the global zone:
>zonecfg:linux:net> info
>net:
>        address: 192.168.0.101/24
>        physical: iwi0
The same.

>iwi0: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
>        inet 192.168.0.50 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
>iwi0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
>        zone linux
>        inet 192.168.0.101 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
The same, except that I do not run DHCP.



>Hope that helps...
All suggestions are helpful and very welcome.

Thanks a lot,
Wolfgang





More information about the brandz-discuss mailing list