[brussels-dev] PSARC 2007/429 Brussels (another brussels issue...)

[James Carlson]

Garrett D'Amore writes:
> > While this is all true, I disagree that we should break these interfaces
> > in S10u5 - we can mark them Obsolete and provide legacy support for the
> > ndd paths.
> >   
> 
> I think that's what I said... mark them obsolete in S10u5, and maybe 
> remove them in Nevada.

That would be a good plan if this project had patch/micro release
binding, but instead it has minor release binding.

I don't think we should declare something to be "obsolete" in S10u5
unless users have something to which they can migrate.  Otherwise,
we're just saying "don't use this ... but don't use anything else,
either."

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677