[brussels-dev] mac_update_reg <-> mac_maxsdu_update

[Artem Kachitchkine]

Sowmini.Varadhan at Sun.COM wrote:
> As was discussed in inception review last week (seb-02), I have pulled
> in the relevant pieces of mac_maxsdu_update() from Clearview gate to
> replace mac_update_reg()-
> 
> see
>   http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sowmini/macsdu/

Looks good to me. A couple of aesthetic questions:

The get function returns both min and max values, while the update 
function is for max only. Is there never a need to change min? Is the 
lack of symmetry due to that?

Some functions in the same group are called refresh, others update. Is 
there a subtle difference or just sloppy naming?

-Artem