[cab-discuss] Review version of charter
Stephen Hahn
sch at eng.sun.com
Fri Jan 20 10:11:58 PST 2006
I was off on a thinking break yesterday, so let me see if I can work
through the comments in one pass:
1. CABs of fewer than three natural persons. My proposed clause 1.1
was what I took away from the CAB call; obviously I messed that
up. If, as Keith says, this process to handle a short-staffed
CAB is meant for the initial CAB only, then this restriction
shouldn't be a subpart to Provision 1, but among the later
"Initial CAB only" Provisions. Simon's revised process
(appointments) looks sensible to me otherwise.
2. The "flying club/treehouse club" and their coffee cans of cash.
We have asked Sun Legal for better wording on these Provisions.
However, I disagree that the amounts of money being envisioned
here match up in quantity or amount with the treehouse club, and
Sun's involvement means that one or more government agencies will
have the possibility of paying attention. The OGB having a
dinner club and the OGB soliciting donations from hundreds of
individuals or companies are simply distinct cases. There are a
number of mechanisms by which the community might organize to
fundraise; I am uncertain that Sun can be a co-participant in any
of them. (Thus the question to the lawyers.)
I would also point out that the Charter will be at best a
reference document in any future "transfer of assets to a
foundation" negotiation. Attempts to write language that would
hold across such a transition should be confined to the
Constitution.
3. Aggressive timeline. I think Mike raises a good point, and
believe that the CAB members should discuss amongst themselves
what they believe is reasonable to produce and on what schedule.
Certainly the April date is a stale one, as it comes from Keith's
first draft, which was proposed in December.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
stephen.hahn at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
More information about the cab-discuss
mailing list