[caiman-discuss] snap upgrade: incremental code review

[John Levon]

On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:34:20AM -0700, Ethan Quach wrote:

> One thing I'm noticing on a current Solaris x86 box is that there seems 
> to be a
> couple other conventions.  Given a /usr/lib/libfoo.so.1, there are a 
> couple cases
> of /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/foo.so or
> /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/libfoomod.so

Well spotted. Note that the libfoomod.so variants are all written by the
same person, and they all have .py files in the same directory. So I
don't think this applies here.

Without the 'lib' part you'd have 'be.so', which seems a little too
generic, so 'libbe.so' is the naming that makes most sense to me. I'm
open to differing opinions...

regards,
john