[caiman-discuss] [pkg-discuss] VM Constructor functional specification
Bart Smaalders
bart.smaalders at Sun.COM
Fri Jun 5 14:27:26 PDT 2009
Dave Miner wrote:
>
> Reality is that users will have layered software beyond the OS that will
> be in those other formats, no matter how easy IPS publication might be.
> Denying the capability to include those in an automated deployment
> product won't work.
SVr4 packages do not correctly handle conflicts between packages,
hence all the auditing in ON builds and RE. Do you expect IPS
to manage this situation? What about tarballs that conflict
w/ the packages already on the system?
I'm pretty hesitant to promise much in this space beyond
the ability to place tarballs or SVr4 packages into areas that are
not also populated w/ IPS packages.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
barts at cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
More information about the caiman-discuss
mailing list