[companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Minor fix in brltty Makefile.sfw

[Laszlo (Laca) Peter]

On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 10:13 -0800, Marilyn Shoemaker wrote:

> when did brltty integrate into the WOS?

With GNOME 2.14, so that's snv_42, AFAIR.

> Is it just in Nevada or is it also in S10

Nevada only.

> any thoughts on how we might track this sort of thing going forward?

Hmm...
I was going to say that it's the JDS team that should look out for
these things and review the companion contents when integrating new
stuff into Solaris.  But this is really not specific to JDS: other
consolidations may equally decide to integrate a new open source
component and be in conflict with some other consolidation.
So what we really need is some sort of registry of open source
components available in/for Solaris and where they are.

Laca

> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> 
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 01:52 -0800, Steve Christensen wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>This is a code review request for a minor fix in the brltty package.  In the Makefile.sfw for that package, there was a reference to /opt/sfw/bin/autoconf.  In Solaris 10, autoconf was in this
> >>directory, but now it is in /usr/sfw/bin.  So a minor change to the Makefile.sfw has been made to take this into account.  The webrev is at
> >>
> >>http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/brlttywebrev/
> >>
> >>This change allows brltty to build correctly in Nevada 45 without autoconf in /opt/sfw/bin.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >brltty is already in the WOS (JDS consolidation).
> >Should be removed from the CCD.
> >
> >Laca
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >companion-discuss mailing list
> >companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> >  
> >