[companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Minor fix in brltty Makefile.sfw

[Paul Cunningham]

I vaguely remember that there was something special about the version on 
the companion (but that maybe my brain playing tricks on me).

paul

Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 10:13 -0800, Marilyn Shoemaker wrote:
> 
> 
>>when did brltty integrate into the WOS?
> 
> 
> With GNOME 2.14, so that's snv_42, AFAIR.
> 
> 
>>Is it just in Nevada or is it also in S10
> 
> 
> Nevada only.
> 
> 
>>any thoughts on how we might track this sort of thing going forward?
> 
> 
> Hmm...
> I was going to say that it's the JDS team that should look out for
> these things and review the companion contents when integrating new
> stuff into Solaris.  But this is really not specific to JDS: other
> consolidations may equally decide to integrate a new open source
> component and be in conflict with some other consolidation.
> So what we really need is some sort of registry of open source
> components available in/for Solaris and where they are.
> 
> Laca
> 
> 
>>Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Steve,
>>>
>>>On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 01:52 -0800, Steve Christensen wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>>This is a code review request for a minor fix in the brltty package.  In the Makefile.sfw for that package, there was a reference to /opt/sfw/bin/autoconf.  In Solaris 10, autoconf was in this
>>>>directory, but now it is in /usr/sfw/bin.  So a minor change to the Makefile.sfw has been made to take this into account.  The webrev is at
>>>>
>>>>http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/brlttywebrev/
>>>>
>>>>This change allows brltty to build correctly in Nevada 45 without autoconf in /opt/sfw/bin.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>
>>>brltty is already in the WOS (JDS consolidation).
>>>Should be removed from the CCD.
>>>
>>>Laca