[companion-discuss] Re: open code for fundamental libraries
Eric Boutilier
Eric.Boutilier at Sun.COM
Tue May 2 13:17:02 PDT 2006
lianep at eng.sun.com wrote:
>"Jeremy Teo" writes:
>
>
>>Hello Liane,
>>
>>IMHO, there are no obvious issues with your points. The key difficulty
>>up to now is getting everyone to agree on a central repository.
>>
>>The problem is social, not technical. If we could just all agree, and
>>get something rolling, that would be ideal. :)
>>
>>
>
>There are some fun technical challenges involved in implementing the
>requirements I suggested. But I do think that the first hurdle is
>getting some agreement around a set of requirements which would allow us
>collectively to build a useful central repository. If we can agree, I'm
>confident there's enough interest and talent around this topic to get the
>technical implementation rolling.
>
>thanks,
>liane
>
>
This provides a great spring-board -- thanks Liane!
My initial thought is that not all the items seem to fall in the
cateogory of common source repository requirements; some seem to be
build-system requirements. (On the other hand, the problem could be that
my notion of what a source repository is is way too narrow...)
Eric
More information about the companion-discuss
mailing list