[companion-discuss] Xterm updates (196 to 229) - review request

[Danek Duvall]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:05:42PM -0800, Mike Sullivan wrote:

> Danek Duvall wrote:
>
>>> | Did you have to add the README fresh?  There is, or at least was, a
>>> | README.sfw file that talked a little about what patches were applied 
>>> and
>>> | how it was built.  Is that no longer there?
>>>
>>> I had to do the METADATA and README.SFWxterm fresh.
>>
>> Okay.  There isn't a README.sfw?  That's what I have in my admittedly old
>> workspace.
>
> README.sfw was the file that went into the Source package to tell you
> how we compiled it and what we may have done to the source, if anything.
> With no source packages it doesn't need to be there, as you can look
> at the source directly now.

Heh.  Okay.  Sorry, Rahul -- you can yank README.SFWxterm, then, as it has
no real contents.

Danek