From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Thu Feb  7 03:23:01 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:23:01 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Companion Packages and Source Tarball Updated
Message-ID: <6872155.1202383588959.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

The Companion packages built with SVN repository version 157 on Nevada 76 are now available
on the <a href="http://opensolaris.org/os/project/companion/downloads/">Companion Download Center</a>  page.  The tarball is dated 20080131.   The Content page and BuildCCD page have been updated as well.
<p>

Steve C.
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Mon Feb 11 18:28:19 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:28:19 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWafio Package
Message-ID: <16514075.1202783411301.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

This is a code review request for an update of the afio package to version 2.5.  The webrev is at

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/afiowebrev/

Details:

1.  Source code updated.
2.  METADATA file added.
3.  pkginfo.tmpl file updated.

This builds correctly in a nightly on NV 81.  The package created installs properly and
produces a working afio binary.

Steve Christensen
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Tue Feb 12 00:05:31 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:05:31 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWafio
	Package
In-Reply-To: <16514075.1202783411301.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <251524.23360.qm@web86505.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Steve,

Wouldn't it be better to change the way this is built
so it is the same as all the other packages in the
gate, ie. uncompress the tarball during the build in a
Makefile.sfw file (rather than have all the source
files uncompressed in the gate). It will then be
easier to update next time around (in another 6 years
time :-) )

Paul

--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a code review request for an update of the
> afio package to version 2.5.  The webrev is at
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/afiowebrev/
> 
> Details:
> 
> 1.  Source code updated.
> 2.  METADATA file added.
> 3.  pkginfo.tmpl file updated.
> 
> This builds correctly in a nightly on NV 81.  The
> package created installs properly and
> produces a working afio binary.
> 
> Steve Christensen
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Tue Feb 12 22:50:39 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:50:39 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Reveiw Request: Very minor Makefile fix
Message-ID: <22212604.1202885618461.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

An extra \ found its way into the pkgdefs/Makefile file.  This has been removed.  See

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/makefilewebrev/

This makes no difference to nightly builds.

Steve Christensen
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Wed Feb 13 00:09:53 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:09:53 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Reveiw Request: Very minor Makefile fix
In-Reply-To: <22212604.1202885618461.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <330999.95945.qm@web86515.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Steve,

--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> An extra \ found its way into the pkgdefs/Makefile
> file.  This has been removed.  See
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/makefilewebrev/
> 
> This makes no difference to nightly builds.

This looks good

Paul


From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Mon Feb 18 01:59:26 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:59:26 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of
	SFWafio	Package
In-Reply-To: <251524.23360.qm@web86505.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <2699862.1203329103584.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

I have redone this update along the lines of Paul's suggestion.  The
new webrev is at

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/afiowebrev/

The details are:

1.  All afio source files have been removed.
2.  The afio 2.5 source file has been added.
3.  A METADATA has been added.
4.  The Makefile.sfw file has been modified to fit the normal build method.
5.  A patch to the CFLAGS in the Makefile has been added.
6.  An install-sfw file has been added.
7.  The pkgdefs/SFWafio/pkginfo.tmpl file has been updated.
8.  Copyright and version numbers updated where needed.  SCCS ids removed.

A nightly build is clean on NV 81.

Steve Christensen


> Steve,
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to change the way this is built
> so it is the same as all the other packages in the
> gate, ie. uncompress the tarball during the build in
> a
> Makefile.sfw file (rather than have all the source
> files uncompressed in the gate). It will then be
> easier to update next time around (in another 6 years
> time :-) )
> 
> Paul
> 
> --- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is a code review request for an update of the
> > afio package to version 2.5.  The webrev is at
> > 
> >
> http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/afiowebrev/
> > 
> > Details:
> > 
> > 1.  Source code updated.
> > 2.  METADATA file added.
> > 3.  pkginfo.tmpl file updated.
> > 
> > This builds correctly in a nightly on NV 81.  The
> > package created installs properly and
> > produces a working afio binary.
> > 
> > Steve Christensen
> > --
> > This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > companion-discuss mailing list
> > companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion
> -discuss
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion
> -discuss
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Mon Feb 18 06:37:32 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:37:32 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWafio
	Package
In-Reply-To: <2699862.1203329103584.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <706065.72617.qm@web86508.mail.ird.yahoo.com>


--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have redone this update along the lines of Paul's
> suggestion.  The
> new webrev is at
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/afiowebrev/


This looks good to me

Paul

> The details are:
> 
> 1.  All afio source files have been removed.
> 2.  The afio 2.5 source file has been added.
> 3.  A METADATA has been added.
> 4.  The Makefile.sfw file has been modified to fit
> the normal build method.
> 5.  A patch to the CFLAGS in the Makefile has been
> added.
> 6.  An install-sfw file has been added.
> 7.  The pkgdefs/SFWafio/pkginfo.tmpl file has been
> updated.
> 8.  Copyright and version numbers updated where
> needed.  SCCS ids removed.
> 
> A nightly build is clean on NV 81.
> 
> Steve Christensen
> 
> 
> > Steve,
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be better to change the way this is
> built
> > so it is the same as all the other packages in the
> > gate, ie. uncompress the tarball during the build
> in
> > a
> > Makefile.sfw file (rather than have all the source
> > files uncompressed in the gate). It will then be
> > easier to update next time around (in another 6
> years
> > time :-) )
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > --- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > This is a code review request for an update of
> the
> > > afio package to version 2.5.  The webrev is at
> > > 
> > >
> >
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/afiowebrev/
> > > 
> > > Details:
> > > 
> > > 1.  Source code updated.
> > > 2.  METADATA file added.
> > > 3.  pkginfo.tmpl file updated.
> > > 
> > > This builds correctly in a nightly on NV 81. 
> The
> > > package created installs properly and
> > > produces a working afio binary.
> > > 
> > > Steve Christensen
> > > --
> > > This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > companion-discuss mailing list
> > > companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> > >
> >
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion
> > -discuss
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > companion-discuss mailing list
> > companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion
> > -discuss
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From Raymond.Xiong at sun.com  Wed Feb 20 02:47:44 2008
From: Raymond.Xiong at sun.com (Huan Xiong)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:47:44 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <16396642.1195417261250.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

Hi,

Can anyone tell me when this package will be integrated? I am porting
ejabberd package to Solaris, it uses Erlang. I checked CCD repository,
it seemed the package wasn't integrated yet.

BTW, I found, due to 6536383 putback, only the latest Erlang release
(otp_src_R12B-1) can be compiled on latest snv build.

Thanks
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From Rahul.G.Nair at Sun.COM  Wed Feb 20 03:45:57 2008
From: Rahul.G.Nair at Sun.COM (rahul)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:15:57 +0530
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
References: <16396642.1195417261250.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <20080220114557.GD4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>

I got stuck on OSR it is still not approved.
https://opensourcereview.central.sun.com/app?action=ViewReq&traq_num=7720

and now I am mired in other work,

[Huan Xiong:]
| Hi,
| 
| Can anyone tell me when this package will be integrated? I am porting
| ejabberd package to Solaris, it uses Erlang. I checked CCD repository,
| it seemed the package wasn't integrated yet.
| 
| BTW, I found, due to 6536383 putback, only the latest Erlang release
| (otp_src_R12B-1) can be compiled on latest snv build.
| 
| Thanks
                                    rahul
--
1. e4 _



From Raymond.Xiong at Sun.COM  Wed Feb 20 04:22:54 2008
From: Raymond.Xiong at Sun.COM (Raymond Xiong)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:22:54 +0800
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <20080220114557.GD4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>
References: <16396642.1195417261250.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<20080220114557.GD4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>
Message-ID: <20080220122254.GA978@Sun.Com>

rahul, 

Thanks for the update! Glad to know it's being worked on. 

BTW, do you know if I can expect the review to be finished
by March? If not(I guess so, :( ), I need to reschedule my
task.

Thanks,
Raymond

On 02/20/08, rahul wrote:
> I got stuck on OSR it is still not approved.
> https://opensourcereview.central.sun.com/app?action=ViewReq&traq_num=7720
> 
> and now I am mired in other work,
> 
> [Huan Xiong:]
> | Hi,
> | 
> | Can anyone tell me when this package will be integrated? I am porting
> | ejabberd package to Solaris, it uses Erlang. I checked CCD repository,
> | it seemed the package wasn't integrated yet.
> | 
> | BTW, I found, due to 6536383 putback, only the latest Erlang release
> | (otp_src_R12B-1) can be compiled on latest snv build.
> | 
> | Thanks
>                                     rahul
> --
> 1. e4 _
> 


From Rahul.G.Nair at Sun.COM  Wed Feb 20 05:34:01 2008
From: Rahul.G.Nair at Sun.COM (rahul)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:04:01 +0530
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <20080220122254.GA978@Sun.Com>
References: <16396642.1195417261250.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<20080220114557.GD4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>
	<20080220122254.GA978@Sun.Com>
Message-ID: <20080220133400.GE4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>

| Thanks for the update! Glad to know it's being worked on. 

Actually , I am mired in work for the present, and am unable to
devote time for this now.

| BTW, do you know if I can expect the review to be finished
| by March? If not(I guess so, :( ), I need to reschedule my
| task.

:( I guess so, btw, even if the review is completed (both OSR and
companion-discuss), I wont be able to putback soon. (see above)

do feel free to use my diffs (and push the OSR) if it is urgent.

                                    rahul
--
1. e4 _



From alan.coopersmith at sun.com  Wed Feb 20 07:37:25 2008
From: alan.coopersmith at sun.com (Alan Coopersmith)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:37:25 -0800
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <20080220122254.GA978@Sun.Com>
References: <16396642.1195417261250.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<20080220114557.GD4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>
	<20080220122254.GA978@Sun.Com>
Message-ID: <47BC4935.1070501@sun.com>

Raymond Xiong wrote:
> rahul, 
> 
> Thanks for the update! Glad to know it's being worked on. 
> 
> BTW, do you know if I can expect the review to be finished
> by March? If not(I guess so, :( ), I need to reschedule my
> task.

Unless your task is to also add stuff to the companion cd, it
shouldn't be depending on anything on the companion cd.

-- 
	-Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
	 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


From Raymond.Xiong at Sun.COM  Wed Feb 20 21:38:32 2008
From: Raymond.Xiong at Sun.COM (Raymond Xiong)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:38:32 +0800
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <47BC4935.1070501@sun.com>
References: <16396642.1195417261250.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<32164254.1203505376210.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
	<20080220114557.GD4494@vayavyam.India.Sun.COM>
	<20080220122254.GA978@Sun.Com> <47BC4935.1070501@sun.com>
Message-ID: <20080221053831.GA11885@Sun.Com>

On 02/20/08, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Raymond Xiong wrote:
> >rahul, 
> >
> >Thanks for the update! Glad to know it's being worked on. 
> >
> >BTW, do you know if I can expect the review to be finished
> >by March? If not(I guess so, :( ), I need to reschedule my
> >task.
> 
> Unless your task is to also add stuff to the companion cd, it
> shouldn't be depending on anything on the companion cd.

Oops, thanks for pointing that out. While this is obvious, I
didn't realize it until you mentioned it.

I will consider to use rahul's diffs to integrate Erlang to
Solaris if necessary. 

Thank All!

-- 
Regards,
Raymond


From james.walker at sun.com  Wed Feb 20 23:04:37 2008
From: james.walker at sun.com (Jim Walker)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:04:37 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Erlang for Companion CD (Request for Review)
In-Reply-To: <47BC4935.1070501@sun.com>
Message-ID: <25733568.1203577507955.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

> Raymond Xiong wrote:
> > rahul, 
> > 
> > Thanks for the update! Glad to know it's being  worked on. 
> > 
> > BTW, do you know if I can expect the review to be finished
> > by March? If not(I guess so, :( ), I need to reschedule my
> > task.
> 
> Unless your task is to also add stuff to the companion cd, it
> shouldn't be depending on anything on the companion cd.
> 

Yep. Erlang would need to go into the SFW consolidation, 
since that is where ejabberd is headed.

Cheers,
Jim
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Thu Feb 21 16:30:48 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:30:48 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWsudo Package
Message-ID: <6487429.1203640514609.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

This is a code review request for the update of SFWsudo from version 1.6.9p4 to version 1.6.9p13.  The webrev is at

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/sudowebrev/

Changes were simple -

1.  Update of sudo source code file.
2.  Copyrights and version numbers changed where needed.

Nightly build on NV 81 is clean.  A test pkgadd  works and creates a working
sudo program.

Steve Christensen
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Fri Feb 22 00:16:29 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:16:29 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWsudo
	Package
In-Reply-To: <6487429.1203640514609.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <13120.35006.qm@web86510.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Looks good to me

Paul

--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a code review request for the update of
> SFWsudo from version 1.6.9p4 to version 1.6.9p13. 
> The webrev is at
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/sudowebrev/
> 
> Changes were simple -
> 
> 1.  Update of sudo source code file.
> 2.  Copyrights and version numbers changed where
> needed.
> 
> Nightly build on NV 81 is clean.  A test pkgadd 
> works and creates a working
> sudo program.
> 
> Steve Christensen
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Sun Feb 24 00:44:29 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:44:29 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWsnort Package
Message-ID: <10527867.1203842736239.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

This is a code review request for the update of the SFWsnort package to version 2.8.0.2.

The webrev is at

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/snortwebrev/

Details -

This is a very simple update.  The source code file is replaced with the latest one, version 
numbers are updated and copyrights changed where needed.  The source code file
is now .gz instead of .bz2 because the snort website uses .gz and does not offer .bz2.

A nightly build on NV81 works with no errors and a pkgadd install creates a working
snort system.

Steve Christensen
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Sun Feb 24 11:31:06 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:31:06 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWsnort
	Package
In-Reply-To: <10527867.1203842736239.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <992522.6737.qm@web86501.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Looks good to me: I assume u have used a gz tarball
rather than bz2 as there isn't a bz2 one.

Paul

--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a code review request for the update of the
> SFWsnort package to version 2.8.0.2.
> 
> The webrev is at
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/snortwebrev/
> 
> Details -
> 
> This is a very simple update.  The source code file
> is replaced with the latest one, version 
> numbers are updated and copyrights changed where
> needed.  The source code file
> is now .gz instead of .bz2 because the snort website
> uses .gz and does not offer .bz2.
> 
> A nightly build on NV81 works with no errors and a
> pkgadd install creates a working
> snort system.
> 
> Steve Christensen
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Sun Feb 24 14:52:37 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:52:37 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWsquid Package
Message-ID: <20017336.1203893681798.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

This is a code review request for the update of the Companion SFWsquid package from version 2.5.STABLE7 to version 2.6.STABLE18.  The webrev is at

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/squidwebrev/

Details -

1.  Source file updated.  .gz compression used since that is what the Squid site offers.
2.  METADATA file added
3.  Version numbers updated where needed (called 2.6.18 in pkginfo.tmpl)
4.  Copyright dates changed and SCCS ids removed when required
5.  .SUFFIXES line removed in Makefile.sfw - no longer needed
6.  RunAccel removed in install-sfw and prototype_com - not part of 2.6.x anymore
7.  cachemgr.conf added in install-sfw and protoytpe_com - new in 2.6.x
8.  location of squidclient and cachemgr.cgi files fixed in install-sfw

A nightly build on NV 81 works and a test pkgadd appears to create a working
squid system.

Steve Christensen
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Mon Feb 25 00:54:56 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:54:56 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Update of SFWsquid
	Package
In-Reply-To: <20017336.1203893681798.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <449532.92626.qm@web86502.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

This looks okay to me

Paul

--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a code review request for the update of the
> Companion SFWsquid package from version 2.5.STABLE7
> to version 2.6.STABLE18.  The webrev is at
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/squidwebrev/
> 
> Details -
> 
> 1.  Source file updated.  .gz compression used since
> that is what the Squid site offers.
> 2.  METADATA file added
> 3.  Version numbers updated where needed (called
> 2.6.18 in pkginfo.tmpl)
> 4.  Copyright dates changed and SCCS ids removed
> when required
> 5.  .SUFFIXES line removed in Makefile.sfw - no
> longer needed
> 6.  RunAccel removed in install-sfw and
> prototype_com - not part of 2.6.x anymore
> 7.  cachemgr.conf added in install-sfw and
> protoytpe_com - new in 2.6.x
> 8.  location of squidclient and cachemgr.cgi files
> fixed in install-sfw
> 
> A nightly build on NV 81 works and a test pkgadd
> appears to create a working
> squid system.
> 
> Steve Christensen
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From sunfreeware at gmail.com  Tue Feb 26 03:16:29 2008
From: sunfreeware at gmail.com (Steve Christensen)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:16:29 PST
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of SFWsquid Package
Message-ID: <12250524.1204024637006.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>

This code review replaces the previous SFWsquid post.  It has been determined that SFWsquid should be removed from the Companion CD since a working squid is now part of Nevada 78 and higher.  The code review is

http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/squidwebrev/


Steve Christensen
--
This messages posted from opensolaris.org


From paulcun at talk21.com  Tue Feb 26 05:29:40 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:29:40 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of SFWsquid
	Package
In-Reply-To: <12250524.1204024637006.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <15979.65718.qm@web86503.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Looks okay to me, except the 'copyright' year needs
changing in the 3 changed files.

p

--- Steve Christensen <sunfreeware at gmail.com> wrote:

> This code review replaces the previous SFWsquid
> post.  It has been determined that SFWsquid should
> be removed from the Companion CD since a working
> squid is now part of Nevada 78 and higher.  The code
> review is
> 
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/squidwebrev/
> 
> 
> Steve Christensen
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM  Tue Feb 26 06:32:33 2008
From: Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM (Milan Jurik)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:32:33 +0100
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of
	SFWsquid	Package
In-Reply-To: <12250524.1204024637006.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
References: <12250524.1204024637006.JavaMail.Twebapp@oss-app1>
Message-ID: <1204036353.2958.36.camel@xylabone>

Hi Steve,

why not to integrate Squid 3.0 to Companion as opposite to 2.6 in SFW? 

Best regards,

Milan

V ?t, 26. 02. 2008 v 12:16, Steve Christensen p??e:
> This code review replaces the previous SFWsquid post.  It has been determined that SFWsquid should be removed from the Companion CD since a working squid is now part of Nevada 78 and higher.  The code review is
> 
> http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/squidwebrev/
> 
> 
> Steve Christensen
> --
> This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss



From paulcun at talk21.com  Tue Feb 26 07:44:46 2008
From: paulcun at talk21.com (paulcun at talk21.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:44:46 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of SFWsquid
	Package
In-Reply-To: <1204036353.2958.36.camel@xylabone>
Message-ID: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>


--- Milan Jurik <Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> why not to integrate Squid 3.0 to Companion as
> opposite to 2.6 in SFW? 

The policy used to be, if it was in solaris proper
then it should not be on the CCD even if solaris
proper's version was way out of date (but that was a
few years ago now).

Paul


> 
> V ??t, 26. 02. 2008 v 12:16, Steve Christensen
> p????e:
> > This code review replaces the previous SFWsquid
> post.  It has been determined that SFWsquid should
> be removed from the Companion CD since a working
> squid is now part of Nevada 78 and higher.  The code
> review is
> > 
> >
>
http://companion.sunfreeware.com/downloads/squidwebrev/
> > 
> > 
> > Steve Christensen
> > --
> > This messages posted from opensolaris.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > companion-discuss mailing list
> > companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> companion-discuss mailing list
> companion-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/companion-discuss
> 



From Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM  Tue Feb 26 08:08:53 2008
From: Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM (Milan Jurik)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:08:53 +0100
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of
	SFWsquid	Package
In-Reply-To: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
References: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1204042133.2958.45.camel@xylabone>

Hi Paul,

V ?t, 26. 02. 2008 v 16:44, paulcun at talk21.com p??e:
> --- Milan Jurik <Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Steve,
> > 
> > why not to integrate Squid 3.0 to Companion as
> > opposite to 2.6 in SFW? 
> 
> The policy used to be, if it was in solaris proper
> then it should not be on the CCD even if solaris
> proper's version was way out of date (but that was a
> few years ago now).
> 

I know, but Squid 3.0 is a bit different from 2.x line, so Companion
could serve as "testing" platform for SFW here.

Best regards,

Milan



From vab at bb-c.de  Tue Feb 26 08:09:09 2008
From: vab at bb-c.de (Volker A. Brandt)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:09:09 +0100
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of
	SFWsquid	Package
In-Reply-To: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
References: <1204036353.2958.36.camel@xylabone>
	<44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <18372.14757.168189.931831@shelob.bb-c.de>

Hello Paul!


> > why not to integrate Squid 3.0 to Companion as
> > opposite to 2.6 in SFW?
>
> The policy used to be, if it was in solaris proper
> then it should not be on the CCD even if solaris
> proper's version was way out of date (but that was a
> few years ago now).

Which for years has been one of the prime arguments of the
Solaris bashers.  I'd much rather see a "SUNW stable, SFW current"
type of philosophy.  Now if this policy was explicitly stated
somewhere... :-)


Cheers -- Volker
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volker A. Brandt                  Consulting and Support for Sun Solaris
Brandt & Brandt Computer GmbH              WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/~vab/
Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim                     Email: vab at bb-c.de
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513              Schuhgr??e: 45
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Rainer J. H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt


From David.Comay at Sun.COM  Tue Feb 26 09:33:29 2008
From: David.Comay at Sun.COM (David.Comay at Sun.COM)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of SFWsquid
 Package
In-Reply-To: <1204042133.2958.45.camel@xylabone>
References: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
	<1204042133.2958.45.camel@xylabone>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0802260929230.22195@police>

> I know, but Squid 3.0 is a bit different from 2.x line, so Companion
> could serve as "testing" platform for SFW here.

Given the move towards a network repository based packaging system, I
think the right thing to do is include Squid 3.0 as a separate version
in that repository.  That can most easily be accomplished by
incorporating that version into SFW alongside the existing 2.6
version.  Perl is an example of such a component (although it currently
is delivered out of ON, the principle is the same.)

At this point forward, I don't see a need to continue adding components
into the Companion CD for Nevada.  Instead, those components should be
integrating into SFW (as part of the modernization work a number of us
have been working on, we intend to support tagging packages with who
supports them along with perhaps a support level.)

dsc


From Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM  Tue Feb 26 10:32:57 2008
From: Milan.Jurik at Sun.COM (Milan Jurik)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:32:57 +0100
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of
	SFWsquid	Package
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0802260929230.22195@police>
References: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
	<1204042133.2958.45.camel@xylabone>
	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0802260929230.22195@police>
Message-ID: <1204050777.1373.10.camel@localhost>

Hi David,

David.Comay at Sun.COM p????e v ??t 26. 02. 2008 v 09:33 -0800:
> > I know, but Squid 3.0 is a bit different from 2.x line, so Companion
> > could serve as "testing" platform for SFW here.
> 
> Given the move towards a network repository based packaging system, I
> think the right thing to do is include Squid 3.0 as a separate version
> in that repository.  That can most easily be accomplished by
> incorporating that version into SFW alongside the existing 2.6
> version.  Perl is an example of such a component (although it currently
> is delivered out of ON, the principle is the same.)
> 
> At this point forward, I don't see a need to continue adding components
> into the Companion CD for Nevada.  Instead, those components should be
> integrating into SFW (as part of the modernization work a number of us
> have been working on, we intend to support tagging packages with who
> supports them along with perhaps a support level.)
> 

There are severel possible issues with integration in SFW:

a) to complete PSARC for software which could be considered as not so
stable (more in development process)

b) on running system you don't need both Squid versions as opposite to
Perl or Apache, but with integration to SFW (/usr) you will need to
solve this co-existence. With "experimental" CCD (/opt) it will be
easier

c) SFW mess itself (large repository of independent components in one
big nightly)

I understand that CCD should die, but there is already some Squid in
CCD, so no new software will be added. And there is no "experimental"
version of repository in osol.org yet, just SFW. CCD could serve in such
way for some time. Also CCD could be exported as separate IPS
repository.

But yes, just an idea, nothing more :-)

Best regards,

Milan



From danek.duvall at Sun.COM  Tue Feb 26 10:53:23 2008
From: danek.duvall at Sun.COM (Danek Duvall)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:53:23 -0800
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of
	SFWsquid	Package
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0802260929230.22195@police>
References: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
	<1204042133.2958.45.camel@xylabone>
	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0802260929230.22195@police>
Message-ID: <20080226185323.GY9130@zruty.sfbay.sun.com>

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:33:29AM -0800, David.Comay at Sun.COM wrote:

> Given the move towards a network repository based packaging system, I
> think the right thing to do is include Squid 3.0 as a separate version
> in that repository.  That can most easily be accomplished by
> incorporating that version into SFW alongside the existing 2.6
> version.

I think, actually, it might be better served as a one-or-the-other
installation, unless there's ever any good reason why you'd have two copies
installed at once.  The incorporations defining the latest Indiana / Nevada
builds could constrain squid to being 2.6, but people could choose 3.x
instead if they so chose.

Danek


From David.Comay at Sun.COM  Tue Feb 26 13:04:56 2008
From: David.Comay at Sun.COM (David.Comay at Sun.COM)
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:04:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [companion-discuss] Code Review Request: Removal of SFWsquid
 Package
In-Reply-To: <20080226185323.GY9130@zruty.sfbay.sun.com>
References: <44452.31804.qm@web86514.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
	<1204042133.2958.45.camel@xylabone>
	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0802260929230.22195@police>
	<20080226185323.GY9130@zruty.sfbay.sun.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0802261303080.22451@police>

> I think, actually, it might be better served as a one-or-the-other
> installation, unless there's ever any good reason why you'd have two copies
> installed at once.  The incorporations defining the latest Indiana / Nevada
> builds could constrain squid to being 2.6, but people could choose 3.x
> instead if they so chose.

The scenario I was thinking was where you might run different versions
of Squid on different ports of the same system (one in production, one
in dev?)  Of course, I would prefer putting such services in different
zones :-) but that does mean extra IP addresses.

dsc