[core-contrib-discuss] Proposed New constitution
Simon Phipps
webmink at sun.com
Sun Mar 1 15:27:29 PST 2009
Thanks for the input, Roy. I doubt I can ever resolve the extreme
anger at Sun you've been exhibiting in your posts to this list (I know
you are still on it in error by the way and I apologise in advance - I
hope someone is fixing it for everyone). And I know you will always
out-argue me even when I'm right, because you are a brilliant logician
and rhetorician :-) But still, one more comment, masochist that I am.
I disagree with you because of the very realities of the OpenSolaris
community you're characterising so sarcastically. We all had the fight
with Sun over OpenSolaris over a year ago, and many of us (me
included) were very unhappy about it. That was then.
The outcome is what it is and we now are where we are. The correct
formulation for the Charter/Constitution is to have clear, simple
rules about how the community will administer itself, have the Charter
make the big statements of purpose and take the two documents together
as the definition for the community. To do otherwise is to pretend we
have a say in things we don't and to pick at scabs that should be left
to heal.
You left because you didn't like that - I have no idea why you feel
the need to come back and say what you're saying. Please don't drag up
all the hatred again.
S.
More information about the core-contrib-discuss
mailing list