[desktop-discuss] Re: [tools-discuss] Proposing /usr/gnu, 3
John Levon
john.levon at sun.com
Fri May 5 07:28:40 PDT 2006
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:42:31AM +0100, John Rice wrote:
> "I'm a bit concerned that "blessed as a GNU project" is an odd match to
> the desired features of /usr/gnu/."
>
> I know what you mean. My goal in the orginal post was to have all the
> various OSS tools present on Solaris in a way that makes it very easy to
> build OSS software out of the box.
Stephen made it clear that the proposal is only intended to deal with the
problem of name-conflicting GNU projects, and isn't intended to cover anything
else. This seems reasonable to me. For a start, I think this currently deals
with any problems we're likely to have. I'm not aware offhand of anything we
may need to build that has naming problems.
> I'm hoping the combination of Bart's proposal on "Serendipitous
> discovery" and Stephen's "/usr/gnu/bin" proposal will go a long way to
> solving the difficulties of building OSS on Solaris. If other OSS tools
> are still missing, that would conflict with what's in /usr/bin then
> we'll need to look again and see if other hierarchies need to be
> introduced, hopefully this will not be the case.
Exactly.
regards,
john
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
More information about the desktop-discuss
mailing list