[desktop-discuss] Re: [companion-discuss] Re: Thoughts on freeware
ports and GUI library"sub-stacks"
Alan DuBoff
Alan.DuBoff at sun.com
Wed May 17 01:21:29 PDT 2006
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 01:55 pm, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Yeah, in my opinion it should be easy to conceive a set of packages that
> even eschews Firefox in favor of something more efficent (which is to
> say, less complex to maintain, as well as smaller/faster), like Dillo
> (dillo.org) for example.
Well, that's going to the extreme, no? Dillo was designed for embedded
applications in mind, so it is extremely smaller/faster, which should be
expected as it's missing a lot of functionality.
There's another small browser based on the KDE/QT libs, and it has less
dependencies than say Konqeror.
I also did some stuff with ViewML (possibly based on kfm these days) and FLTK
on a previous project, it's pretty popular also.
--
Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems
Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group
_______________________________________________
desktop-discuss mailing list
desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
More information about the desktop-discuss
mailing list