[desktop-discuss] Re: [companion-discuss] Re: [tools-discuss] Proposing /usr/gnu

[Laszlo (Laca) Peter]

On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 07:39 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Jeremy Teo wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I've been following this thread from some time and I would just like
> > to clarify the following:
> > 
> > 1. What is the key difference between /usr/sfw, /usr/gnu, and the 
> > Companion CD?
> > 
> >> From what I understand:
> > 
> > /usr/sfw: A mistake, and now everything that is stable should be moved 
> > into /usr
> 
> Everything that doesn't have the same name as an existing thing in /usr
> should be moved.

So shouldn't everything in /usr/sfw that has the same name as an
existing thing in /usr be moved to /usr/gnu (after officially
defining it) or shouldn't we just redefine the role of /usr/sfw
and not create /usr/gnu?

Laca