[desktop-discuss] SFE binary packages for OpenSolaris

[Brian Cameron]

Roman:

>> Also, to what degree do you intend to get involved with the
>> project, in addition to whatever is needed to maintain the 
>> OpenSolaris spec file.
> 
> All what it needs to offer actual spec files of a given
> project.

Yes, I think that (strictly speaking) the OpenSolaris spec file
maintainer is really only responsible for the actual OpenSoalris
spec file.  However, I think I'm trying to encourage that such
maintainers should really consider being involved with the
module community directly.

For example, I own a number of spec files and common community tasks
I do include:

- Fixing bugs as they are noticed.  Often these are Solaris specific
   build or runtime issues, but its also good to get involved with
   fixing bugs in general, if you have the time.

- Familiarize yourself with the bugs for the module on whatever
   bug tracking tool is used by the module.  It's good to be involved
   with adding comments if you notice any new information that might
   help resolve any bug (like perhaps letting them know that you can
   replicate the problem using OpenSolaris).

- When we patch a module, I try to make sure that we file a bug
   in bugzilla (or whatever bug tracking tool/mail list/etc.)
   so that the fix gets upstream.  This sometimes involves some
   interaction with the maintainer if they want additional changes
   made to get the patch upstream.

- Review documentation and file bugs when issues are noticed, or
   otherwise help to improve manpages, gtk-docs, etc. so that they are as
   accurate as possible.

I think that people considering to be a OpenSolaris spec file maintainer
should consider getting involved in these ways, even if it isn't
strictly required.

Brian