[desktop-discuss] Re: perl-gtk2 spec files.

[Mike Kiedrowski]

Hi,
Here are the patches for the SFEperl* specs.
I noticed and fixed a couple other little things:

-# spec file for package SFEperl-algrthmdiff
+# spec file for package SFEperl-algorithm-diff

and

-Name:                    SUNWperl-time-date
+Name:                    SFEperl-time-date

Everything else just changes how the version is defined.

Also, the SFEperl-extutils-pkgs , the spec itself, the package it 
creates and the other specs
that declare it a dep use SFEperl-extutils-pkg (no 's'). I figured it 
was just a typo when the spec was renamed.
So I renamed the spec I was working on to *-pkg and created the diff 
from that (thats why its separate from the others).

And here we go...
[...]
patching file SFEperl-algorithm-diff.spec
patching file SFEperl-cairo.spec
patching file SFEperl-clone.spec
patching file SFEperl-data-hierarchy.spec
patching file SFEperl-extutils-dep.spec
patching file SFEperl-extutils-pkg.spec
patching file SFEperl-file-type.spec
patching file SFEperl-glib.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-canvas.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-gconf.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-print.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-rsvg.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-vfs.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-vte.spec
patching file SFEperl-gnome2-wnck.spec
patching file SFEperl-gtk2-gladexml.spec
patching file SFEperl-gtk2-html2.spec
patching file SFEperl-gtk2-mozembed.spec
patching file SFEperl-gtk2-sourceview.spec
patching file SFEperl-gtk2.spec
patching file SFEperl-gtk2-trayicon.spec
patching file SFEperl-io-digest.spec
patching file SFEperl-io-dynamic.spec
patching file SFEperl-io-eol.spec
patching file SFEperl-io-symlink.spec
patching file SFEperl-pod-escapes.spec
patching file SFEperl-pod-simple.spec
patching file SFEperl-regexp-shellish.spec
patching file SFEperl-time-date.spec
patching file SFEperl-uri.spec
patching file SFEperl-yaml.spec
[...]
Summary:

                         package |      status | details
---------------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------
          SFEperl-algorithm-diff |      PASSED |
                SFEperl-cairo |      PASSED |
                   SFEperl-clone |      PASSED |
          SFEperl-data-hierarchy |      PASSED |
            SFEperl-extutils-dep |      PASSED |
            SFEperl-extutils-pkg |      PASSED |
               SFEperl-file-type |      PASSED |
                    SFEperl-glib |      PASSED |
           SFEperl-gnome2-canvas |      PASSED |
            SFEperl-gnome2-gconf |      PASSED |
            SFEperl-gnome2-print |      PASSED |
             SFEperl-gnome2-rsvg |      PASSED |
              SFEperl-gnome2-vfs |      PASSED |
              SFEperl-gnome2-vte |      PASSED |
             SFEperl-gnome2-wnck |      PASSED |
                  SFEperl-gnome2 |      PASSED |
           SFEperl-gtk2-gladexml |      PASSED |
              SFEperl-gtk2-html2 |      PASSED |
           SFEperl-gtk2-mozembed |      PASSED |
         SFEperl-gtk2-sourceview |      PASSED |
           SFEperl-gtk2-trayicon |      PASSED |
                    SFEperl-gtk2 |      PASSED |
               SFEperl-io-digest |      PASSED |
              SFEperl-io-dynamic |      PASSED |
                  SFEperl-io-eol |      PASSED |
              SFEperl-io-symlink |      PASSED |
             SFEperl-pod-escapes |      PASSED |
              SFEperl-pod-simple |      PASSED |
         SFEperl-regexp-shellish |      PASSED |
              SUNWperl-time-date |      PASSED |
                     SFEperl-uri |      PASSED |
                    SFEperl-yaml |      PASSED |


Pkginfo on the packages looks good.

Oh ya, almost forgot, I also attached a patch for SFEeterm.
It adds the Eterm backgrounds package to the spec. The backgrounds are 
all listed in the
Eterm menubar,  but there installed by a seperate tarball.

Any suggestions, or if anything needs a redo, let me know.

~ Mike


Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 10:23 -0600, Mike Kiedrowski wrote:
>   
>> Would something on this order be ok (see patch)? I wanted to check 
>> before I did any more of them.
>>     
>
> Yeah looks good.  Please work from the svn sources, I made some minor
> changes to your original spec files before committing them.
>
> What you called file_type_version we usually call tarball_version,
> but doesn't really matter.
>
> Thanks,
> Laca
>
>
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SFEperl-patches.tar.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5308 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss-beta1.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20070129/aac41696/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SFEperl-extutils-pkg-spec-version.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1965 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss-beta1.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20070129/aac41696/attachment-0001.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SFEeterm-spec-backgrounds.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 973 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oss-beta1.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20070129/aac41696/attachment-0002.bin