[desktop-discuss] [xwin-discuss] vncviewer conflict

[elw at stderr.org]

>> What I would like to see is the proper RealVNC viewer integrated as 
>> vncviewer. It has the functionality, features, and performance that we 
>> VNC users need.
>
> To clarify (i.e. what I should have said earlier), the RealVNC vncviewer 
> is included in the sources I'm building in X, so delivering it would 
> just be a matter of adding it to the package and running another simple 
> ARC fasttrack.
>
> The java vnc viewer which is in vino & realvnc needs to remain for the 
> httpd/java applet functionality (both vino & realvnc include it, for 
> Xvnc packaging in Solaris/OpenSolaris, I've just linked to the copy vino 
> already provides instead of duplicating the .jar file on the installed 
> system).


Not to be a total pain, but...

... how does this affect the chances of getting VirtualGL and TurboVNC 
cleanly deployed within opensolaris, and later Solaris proper?

vino + RealVNC + TurboVNC-a-tightvnc-fork all in the same distribution 
seems... complicated... to me.

Sorry to bring it up, but VirtualGL is *awfully* cool.

--elijah