[dtrace-discuss] [networking-discuss] Re: DTrace Network Providers, take 2
Darren.Reed at Sun.COM
Darren.Reed at Sun.COM
Fri Jul 6 16:58:45 PDT 2007
Adam Leventhal wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:24:47AM -0700, Darren.Reed at Sun.COM wrote:
>
>
>>Adam's email suggest that SDT probes are only ever going to be
>>private but you're suggesting otherwise and those that Brendan
>>is working on aren't SDT, if I recall correctly. Who's right here?
>>
>>While I don't actually envisage wanting to promote an SDT probe,
>>at this point, to anything above private, I'd just like to know if there
>>is some subtlety to the difference between what you've said above
>>and what Adam was saying that I'm missing.
>>
>>
>
>I think is an instance where it would be beneficial to RTFM. A better
>understanding of DTrace and it's providers would help you answer your
>questions.
>
>
Reading sdt(7) does clear up any misunderstandings I had.
Is sdt likely to be upgraded to a "committed" interface?
Darren
More information about the dtrace-discuss
mailing list