[indiana-discuss] scope (was ZFS to the max)

David.Comay at Sun.COM David.Comay at Sun.COM
Wed Aug 1 19:33:27 PDT 2007


> The thing that I'm calling tricky, but that might be very useful at
> this point I think, would be to identify and tabulate encumberances in
> terms of our existing smallest supportable core, SUNWCrnet:
>
> Step 1. Identify packages in SUNWCrnet that are vital (from the perspective
>         of the constructor kit) but currently non redistributable.
>
> Step 2. Building on set #1, expand to include the non-redistributable
>         packages that are important (as opposed to vital).

This is a reasonable approach although I would start out with SUNWCreq
as a starting point rather than SUNWCrnet.

There definitely are some packages in any case which will need to be
refactored in order to remove components which aren't redistributable.

dsc



More information about the indiana-discuss mailing list