[indiana-discuss] A different take

[Glynn Foster]

Ian Murdock wrote:
> Yes, that's the current thinking, though we must do more than just
> build a base for others to take and leverage--that's just part of
> it. The other part is building a complete OS that people would
> actually want to use. The core by itself isn't going to be
> interesting. Indiana may not meet everyone's needs, but it should meet
> someone's.. Perhaps I'm just being thrown by your use of the term
> "basic". I think more of Indiana Core and Indiana, with the
> latter including the desktop etc. (and comprising the single CD).
> Otherwise, I'm in full agreement that this is the right way.

And if we do a really good job at that complete OS (of which I'm in agreement
with Ian), then things like Fedora's Revisor start getting interesting for
anyone who wants something a little different -

http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/


Glynn