[indiana-discuss] Default Partitions sizes

Mike Gerdts mgerdts at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 09:55:08 PDT 2007


On 10/7/07, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> I completely agree, perhaps "syspool" and "userpool" would be the most
> appropriate here? With /usr/local falling under userpool perhaps?

Not if pkgadd (or its successor) put stuff there or is likely to do so
in the future.  If pkgadd or its successor has a monolithic package
database, anything the package database touches must be part of the
root pool.  To me the root pool minimally contains the set of
directories that are affected by the packaging database that delivers
/.

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/


More information about the indiana-discuss mailing list