[indiana-discuss] [desktop-discuss] CD Space analysis and recommendations
Calum Benson
Calum.Benson at Sun.COM
Thu Aug 14 16:44:08 PDT 2008
On 14 Aug 2008, at 16:34, Dave Miner wrote:
>>
>
> I tend to agree with this reasoning, and am not inclined to push for
> copy-paste engineering in themes anymore than I would anywhere
> else. I
> would ask, though, that space considerations be a part of the
> calculation in constructing the themes and dependency chains. Also,
> any
> thoughts about Glynn's suggestion of not shipping so many icon
> variants?
> For example, the 192x192 nimbus icons are 4+ MB all by themselves...
Yep, I'd certainly have no issues with splitting out the 96x96 sizes
and upwards. Icons bigger than 48x48 are rarely needed on most
desktops, but we might want to keep the next size up (72x72) just in
case-- they might be called into play on big hi-res displays.
(Even the large print themes don't ship anything bigger than 48x48,
although their design means they do scale up a little better, when
called upon to do so.)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum.benson at sun.com GNOME Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
More information about the indiana-discuss
mailing list