[indiana-discuss] Improve supportability though a single, unencumbered, unique release name.

[Alan Coopersmith]

Brian Nitz wrote:
> I'd be in favor of the pure "OpenSolaris" name if there were either a 
> mechanism for distinguishing release 1.0 from all subsequent releases in 
> mailing lists and online (googled) documentation,

The plan presented at the developer summit last fall was to use date names
instead of version numbers, though there was discussion about whether it
would be better for the date string to be "2008.05" or "05/08" (the first
being easier to sort correctly).

They also were talking about "Indiana" being only the code name for the
first release, with "Jericho" coming 6 months later, and something else
("Kalamazoo"?   I don't remember) 6 months after that.

-- 
	-Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
	 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering