[indiana-discuss] SFE IPS repository?

[Laszlo (Laca) Peter]

I agree with both of you so I'm moving this discussion to SFE-devel.
Let's start to clean up SFE.

Laca

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 20:23 +0800, Alfred Peng wrote:
> S h i v wrote:
> > SFE is always in a flux and the specs are now & then being moved
> > around. It is a great place to share build recipes, but if packages
> > repo is to be created based on SFE, then it needs to be build clean
> > always in its entirety (which often is not the case), it should have a
> > very clear developement stack (build environment), this again is not
> > the case since the state of the machine of different SFE contributor
> > can be different & and as a result the auto tools output may not be
> > identical.
> >
> > Having a pkg repo will need lot more ongoing effort. It will need a
> > review & acceptance process and some more robust procedures around the
> > current SFE contribution mechanism.
> >   
> Totally agree. We really need to have a process/roadmap ready to make
> sure SFE specs are in good shape. The sfe mailing
> list(https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgbuild-sfe-devel)
> seems to be a good start point that could address the code review issue
> at least.
> 
> One thing not so clear to me is how we can maintain the package
> dependency across sfe repo and the existing pkg.opensolaris.org repo.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alfred
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss