[indiana-discuss] 2008.05 upgrade to snv_90 causing authentication issues

[James Cornell]

Not really... Apple's not always about technical advancements, it's  
more about presentation.  ZFS sadly doesn't present itself in typical  
Apple fashion, so making comparisons is pointless.  Technically ZFS is  
better, because it's more efficient than making tons of useless copies  
and doing tests after the fact, while Time Machine is vastly more  
presentable to the world and easier to manipulate, not just because  
it's graphical, but conceptually speaking the method of restoration  
has a look and feel and fluid motion which doesn't require reading or  
learning much.  For most crouds, time is of the essence.  It'd be nice  
to see ZFS CIFS + OSX + rsync for backups though, preferably with  
animated barber shop poles and search boxes.

James
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Vitaly Davidenko wrote:

> I did not delete previous BE and rebooted into that. SMB share works
> in snv_86, thank to ZFS, it is more cool feature, than Apple's Time
> Machine:)
> But, it is the fact - CIFS does not work in snv_90.
>
> On 08.06.2008, at 18:28, John Dobak wrote:
>
>> I did delete the snv_86 boot environment through beadm after ensuring
>> everything worked, could that have effected anything?
>
> _______________________________________________
> indiana-discuss mailing list
> indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/attachments/20080609/d771197d/attachment.html>