[indiana-discuss] Another dumb question du jour

[Glynn Foster]

On 18/06/2008, at 5:49 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> that is *wild* because I see this
>
> -bash-3.2# pkg search -r smbd
> en_CA.ISO8859-1: unknown locale
> INDEX      ACTION    VALUE                     PACKAGE
> basename   file      usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd       pkg:/SUNWsmbs at 0.5.11-0.79
> basename   file      usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd       pkg:/SUNWsmbs at 0.5.11-0.86
> basename   file      usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd       pkg:/SUNWsmbs at 0.5.11-0.86
> basename   link      usr/sbin/smbd             pkg:/SUNWsmba at 3.0.28-0.86
> basename   link      usr/sbin/smbd             pkg:/SUNWsmba at 3.0.27.1-0.79
> basename   link      usr/sbin/smbd             pkg:/SUNWsmba at 3.0.28-0.86
> basename   link      usr/sbin/smbd             pkg:/SUNWsmba at 3.0.26.1-0.75
> basename   file      usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd       pkg:/SUNWsmbs at 0.5.11-0.89
> basename   link      usr/sbin/smbd             pkg:/SUNWsmba at 3.0.28.1-0.89
> basename   file      usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd       pkg:/SUNWsmbs at 0.5.11-0.90
> basename   link      usr/sbin/smbd             pkg:/SUNWsmba at 3.0.28.1-0.90

-r searches against the repository, and shows the hits of your search  
against the packages available there.

> -bash-3.2# pkg list | grep smb
> SUNWlibsmbclient                              3.0.28-0.86      
> installed  ----
> SUNWsmbfs                                     0.5.11-0.86      
> installed  ----
> SUNWsmbfskr                                   0.5.11-0.86      
> installed  ----
>
> cool right ?
>
> -bash-3.2# find /usr -type f -name smbd
>
> returns nothing. which is not cool.

SUNWsmba and SUNWsmbs are different, and it looks like they are not  
installed on your system.


Glynn