[indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

[Ian Collins]

Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
> So much for that.
> FF2 has been a bit slow already (but very stable), so has FF1 at its time.
> But FF3's CPU- and mem- hungriness goes over the top.
> Enough is enough.
> IMO they will lose market share.
>
>   
That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen
commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its
predecessor.

It's certainly been stable long term on my desktop since 3.0.3.

-- 
Ian.