[indiana-discuss] [osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

[Ian Collins]

Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Ian Collins <ian at ianshome.com> wrote:
>   
>> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen
>> commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its
>> predecessor.
>>
>> It's certainly been stable long term on my desktop since 3.0.3.
> It depends on where you read, and which benchmarks under which
> circumstances in which environments and loads and on which platforms
> ... etc., done by which people ...     you are looking at.
>
>   
They may be windows centric, but I've found this lot to be pretty
thorough and honest in their reviews:

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/features/218316/performance.html?searchString=firefox+3

> Come here, count numbers or take even the most primitive stop-watch
> with yourself, and I'm really interested if you are continuing to
> insist on the speed improvements.
>   
How can a continue to insist upon something I haven't said?

-- 
Ian.