[indiana-discuss] Name of Distro?

[Stephen Lau]

Ian Murdock wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>> 1. You are correct, binary distributions matter the most, by far.
>>
>>    And your point is?
> 
> I repeat: That's why we need OpenSolaris to be a binary distribution.

Why?  I fail to see why the former leads to the latter.

Ubuntu has arguably built itself into a great platform without calling 
itself Debian, or Linux.

Why does Indiana need to call itself OpenSolaris?

cheers,
steve

-- 
stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


--
This message posted from opensolaris.org