[indiana-discuss] Memory size requirement of Indiana

Aubrey.Li aubreylee at gmail.com
Fri Sep 5 11:46:52 PDT 2008


On Nov 10, 2007 1:00 AM, Bryan Boone <Bryan.Boone at sas.com> wrote:
> I, for one, have tried them (more times than I care to remember).
> For me, neither was stable enough.  Solaris was the most stable (tho
> funky disk partitioning) Solaris Express was good (tho a little less
> stable). Belenix failed to write the ram disk on installation.  Nexenta
> wouldn't boot after a dist-upgrade.
>
> That is what interests me about OpenSolaris.  Solaris stability and
> (potentially) stable packaging.
>
>
> -Bryan
>
> Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> > I fail to understand why Belenix or Nexenta (both of which are based on
> > OpenSolaris) don't fit your requirement ?
> >
> > -Sanjay
> >

Yes, as bryan explained, I tried Belenix and Nexenta as well, both of
them are not stable and are not doable for me. (you can play with
them, but not for official project)

-Aubrey
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

--
This message posted from opensolaris.org



More information about the indiana-discuss mailing list