[intel-platform-discuss] Code review for several MONITOR/MWAIT idle loop CRs

johansen-osdev at sun.com johansen-osdev at sun.com
Wed Aug 29 11:18:58 PDT 2007


Bill,
These changes generally quite good.  The only thing that I would
consider changing would be the use of kmem_alloc() and size_actual,
buf_actual in the struct mwait_info.

If you instead use kmem_cache_alloc() for these structures, you can
specify the required alignment when you create the cache as part of
kmem_cache_create().  This assumes that all mwait_info structs will need
to be aligned to the same boundaries.  (I don't know if that's a safe
assumption in this case.)

Hope that helps,

-j


On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:14:45PM -0700, Bill Holler wrote:
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bholler/mwait_fixes
> 
> Here is a webrev code review for the following idle loop MONITOR/MWAIT
> CRs (Change Requests):
> 
> 6577948 <http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsp?cr=6577948> 
> mach_alloc_mwait leaks memory when a CPU fails to start
> 6588054 <http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsp?cr=6588054> panic() in 
> mach_alloc_mwait() should be changed to degraded operation...
> 6596141 <http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsp?cr=6596141> Solaris 
> should not use an unmodified MWAIT idle loop on AMD 10h due to increased 
> power consumption
> 
> 
> While these are relatively low priority, I want to get these in soon for
> maximum S10U5 soak time.
> 
> Testing completed:
> 1) The x86 build of this kernel has passed ON PIT DIY.  The SPARC build
>      is currently in ON PIT DIY and looks ok.  (There are no common changes
>      that should effect SPARC.)
> 2) libmicro did not regress.
>     PERF PIT is not planned as these are enable/disable changes which should
>     not change performance in either state.
> 3) The memory leak is fiked in unit testing with all non-boot cpus forced to
>     fail to online using cpufailset debug hook.
> 4) My desktop has been running this for 2 weeks without incident.
> 
> Ongoing testing:
> 1) Barcelona testing is ongoing.
> 2) 6588054 error injection testing is ongoing.
> 
> Thank you,
> Bill Holler
> 
> _______________________________________________
> intel-platform-discuss mailing list
> intel-platform-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-platform-discuss


More information about the intel-platform-discuss mailing list