jds SVN: spec-files
Laszlo (Laca) Peter
laca at sun.com
Fri Jun 8 03:04:58 PDT 2007
Ah, okay, that's fine.
Thanks for the explanation, Brian.
Laca
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 14:29 +0800, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Laca:
>
> I think you misunderstand. This checking got broken when we moved
> patches from Solaris/patches to spec-file/patches. Previously we were
> patching the code in the SUNWgnome-session.spec file instead of
> gnome-session.spec. This patch was only being applied when HAL was
> not enabled since we only ship gnome-volcheck if HAL isn't being used.
> We don't ship gnome-volcheck anymore since HAL has gone in.
>
> The problem was that after this patch was moved to the
> gnome-session.spec file, we started applying the patch all the time. So
> you in GNOME 2.19 you will incorrectly see a gnome-volcheck entry in
> your /usr/share/gnome/default.session file. This obviously does nothing
> since we don't ship this program anymore.
>
> Therefore the "%if %with_hal" checking has been likewise moved to the
> gnome-session.spec, so now this patch should only get applied when HAL
> is not installed.
>
> This is the behavior we want, so I think Irene did the right thing here.
>
> Brian
>
> >> * SUNWgnome-session.spec: Remove %if %with_hal, since it is no use.
> >> * base-specs/gnome-session.spec: %if %with_hal then do not apply patch7,
> >> volcheck.diff so that this patch will not be applied when HAL is enabled.
> >> Also modify the source path so that the source can be found.
> >
> > I'd like to keep the %with_hal stuff around please.
> > It's very useful if you try to build JDS on Solaris 10, which
> > is possible if you upgrade a few libs like Xft and fontconfig and
> > disable HAL support in GNOME.
> >
> > Laca
> >
> >
>
More information about the jds-notify
mailing list